Abstract
Biomaterials for bone regeneration techniques can preface rehabilitation implantation, may intervene in the same step with the implantation, or they can find the insertion in reconstructive periodontal therapy. This study aimed to quantify the contribution that different materials may bring for bone regeneration potential in gum regeneration in resizing bone structures affected, in order to establish oral rehabilitation.There were considered a total of five bone regeneration materials(Hidroxiapatite, Bio-Oss, OsteoGraf /N, Osteogen, Cerasorb ), applied in similar clinical situations, radiological assessment of bone regeneration issues, made before the application, immediately after application and 6 months after application. Regarding the quality of bone neo formation, the bone structure was very dense when using Bio-oss and Cerasorb, relevant issues the X-ray that provides the necessary information. In terms of clinical results, they were very good for the other three biomaterials used for bone regeneration. When used properly, biomaterials for bone regeneration provide very good results in terms of maintaining bone volume to withstand the demands, offering also a high percentage of vitality, safety and lack of complications.
Keywords: regeneration; biomaterials; augmentation; bone density