Abstract
The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the mechanical parameters at compression tests for two different restorative composite resins. The materials here under study were: Gradia Direct (GC Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) and Filtek Ultimate Universal Restorative, (3M ESPE, St. Paul, MN, USA). 30 cylindrical samples, 15 for each material, with a thickness of 6 mm and a diameter of 5 mm, were made. The compression behavior at mechanical tests for each sample was analyzed. One-Sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test followed by Paired Samples t-Test was used for statistical analysis and determining the level of significance. Gradia Direct had a lower value of Young’s modulus than Filtek Ultimate Universal Restorative, the results being statistically significant (p = 0.001 [ 0.05). The comparative evaluation of the compressive strength did not reveal statistically significant results between the two materials (p = 0.098 ] 0,05). Regarding the compressive strain the values were significantly lower for Filtek Ultimate Universal Restorative (p=0.000 [ 0.05). The microhybrid composite evaluated in the present study proved to have better mechanical properties than the nanofilled composite.
Keywords: mechanical parameters; compression test; restorative composite