ABOUT INDEXING EDITORIAL BOARD ARCHIVES AUTHOR GUIDELINES SUBMIT PAPER NEWS, EVENTS AUTHOR'S PAGE CONTACT
Materiale Plastice
Cite as: Mater. Plast.
https://doi.org/10.37358/Mat.Plast.1964

OSIM Nr. R102356
ISSN Print 0025-5289
ISSN Online 2668-8220
Journal Metrics
* Impact factor 2019: 1.517
* 5-Year IF: 1.179
* CiteScore: 2.4
* H index: 22
Materiale Plastice - Latest Issue

Latest Issue >>>
ARCHIVES
   Volume 58, 2021
   Volume 57, 2020
   Volume 56, 2019
   Volume 55, 2018
   Volume 54, 2017
   Volume 53, 2016
   Volume 52, 2015
   Volume 51, 2014
   Volume 50, 2013
   Volume 49, 2012
   Volume 48, 2011
   Volume 47, 2010
   Volume 46, 2009
   Volume 45, 2008
   Volume 44, 2007
   Volume 43, 2006
   Volume 42, 2005
   Volume 41, 2004
   Volume 40, 2003
 
<<<< back

Materiale Plastice (Mater. Plast.), Year 2020, Volume 57, Issue 4, 343-352

https://doi.org/10.37358/MP.20.4.5434

GEORGE BELGIU ORCID LOGO, CRISTIAN GH. TURC, CONSTANTIN CARAUSU

Selection of Subtractive Manufacturing Technology Versus Additive Manufacturing Technology for Rapid Prototyping of a Polymeric Product


Abstract:
The Additive Manufacturing (AM) industry has expanded steadily, occupying the market very quickly. New types of 3D printers have appeared and new types of polymeric and composite materials have been developed for these printers. Thus it passed very quickly from the stage in which the parts that were made by rapid prototyping (RP) only to be exposed (demonstration parts) to stage AM the parts are fully functional. Of course, the future of AM is still on the horizon, it is barely visible. The other technologies for forming the geometry of the part, ie subtractive manufacturing technology and formative manufacturing technology are still the basis of industrial production. Each technology has its own advantages and disadvantages and is chosen on a case-by-case basis, depending on the objectives pursued. In this paper, a study is made on the rapid prototyping of a single pump rotor part. The material of the piece is of polymer type, ABS. The piece was made in two variants: by additive manufacturing technology (PolyJet) and by subtractive manufacturing technology (milling). After processing, several parameters were followed, such as the functionality of the part, the surface quality, the mechanical tensile strength, the dimensional accuracy, and last but not least the manufacturing cost and the duration of the manufacturing cycle. The data thus obtained were processed with an artificial intelligence program for decision making.


Keywords:
plastic part; rapid prototyping; 3D printing; additive manufacturing; artificial intellicence

Issue: 2020 Volume 57, Issue 4
Pages: 343-352
Publication date: 2021/1/6
https://doi.org/10.37358/MP.20.4.5434
download pdf   Download Pdf Article
Creative Commons License
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Citation Styles
Cite this article as:
BELGIU, G., TURC, C.G., CARAUSU, C., Selection of Subtractive Manufacturing Technology Versus Additive Manufacturing Technology for Rapid Prototyping of a Polymeric Product, Mater. Plast., 57(4), 2020, 343-352.

Vancouver
Belgiu G, Turc CG, Carausu C. Selection of Subtractive Manufacturing Technology Versus Additive Manufacturing Technology for Rapid Prototyping of a Polymeric Product. Mater. Plast.[internet]. 2020 Dec;57(4):343-352. Available from: https://doi.org/10.37358/MP.20.4.5434


APA 6th edition
Belgiu, G., Turc, C.G. & Carausu, C. (2020). Selection of Subtractive Manufacturing Technology Versus Additive Manufacturing Technology for Rapid Prototyping of a Polymeric Product. Materiale Plastice, 57(4), 343-352. https://doi.org/10.37358/MP.20.4.5434


Harvard
Belgiu, G., Turc, C.G., Carausu, C. (2020). 'Selection of Subtractive Manufacturing Technology Versus Additive Manufacturing Technology for Rapid Prototyping of a Polymeric Product', Materiale Plastice, 57(4), pp. 343-352. https://doi.org/10.37358/MP.20.4.5434


IEEE
G. Belgiu, C.G. Turc, C. Carausu, "Selection of Subtractive Manufacturing Technology Versus Additive Manufacturing Technology for Rapid Prototyping of a Polymeric Product". Materiale Plastice, vol. 57, no. 4, pp. 343-352, 2020. [online]. https://doi.org/10.37358/MP.20.4.5434


Text
George Belgiu, Cristian Gh. Turc, Constantin Carausu,
Selection of Subtractive Manufacturing Technology Versus Additive Manufacturing Technology for Rapid Prototyping of a Polymeric Product,
Materiale Plastice,
Volume 57, Issue 4,
2020,
Pages 343-352,
ISSN 2668-8220,
https://doi.org/10.37358/MP.20.4.5434.
(https://revmaterialeplastice.ro/Articlegs.asp?ID=5434)
Keywords: plastic part; rapid prototyping; 3D printing; additive manufacturing; artificial intellicence


RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Selection of Subtractive Manufacturing Technology Versus Additive Manufacturing Technology for Rapid Prototyping of a Polymeric Product
A1 - Belgiu, George
A2 - Turc, Cristian Gh.
A3 - Carausu, Constantin
JF - Materiale Plastice
JO - Mater. Plast.
PB - Materiale Plastice SRL
SN - 2668-8220
Y1 - 2020
VL - 57
IS - 4
SP - 343
EP - 352
UR - https://doi.org/10.37358/MP.20.4.5434
KW - plastic part
KW - rapid prototyping
KW - 3D printing
KW - additive manufacturing
KW - artificial intellicence
ER -


BibTex
@article{MatPlast2020P343,
author = {Belgiu George and Turc Cristian Gh. and Carausu Constantin},
title = {Selection of Subtractive Manufacturing Technology Versus Additive Manufacturing Technology for Rapid Prototyping of a Polymeric Product},
journal = {Materiale Plastice},
volume = {57},
number = {4},
pages = {343-352},
year = {2020},
issn = {2668-8220},
doi = {https://doi.org/10.37358/MP.20.4.5434},
url = {https://revmaterialeplastice.ro/Articlegs.asp?ID=5434}
}
<<<< back
 
  Search Authors
Crossref Member Badge
 DOI  logo
 Gold Open Access | Source=http://www.plos.org/  | Author=art designer at PLoS
Creative Commons License