ABOUT INDEXING EDITORIAL BOARD ARCHIVES AUTHOR GUIDELINES SUBMIT PAPER NEWS, EVENTS AUTHOR'S PAGE CONTACT
Materiale Plastice
Cite as: Mater. Plast.
https://doi.org/10.37358/Mat.Plast.1964

OSIM Nr. R102356
ISSN Print 0025-5289
ISSN Online 2668-8220
Materiale Plastice - Latest Issue

Latest Issue >>>
ARCHIVES
   Volume 61, 2024
   Volume 60, 2023
   Volume 59, 2022
   Volume 58, 2021
   Volume 57, 2020
   Volume 56, 2019
   Volume 55, 2018
   Volume 54, 2017
   Volume 53, 2016
   Volume 52, 2015
   Volume 51, 2014
   Volume 50, 2013
   Volume 49, 2012
   Volume 48, 2011
   Volume 47, 2010
   Volume 46, 2009
   Volume 45, 2008
   Volume 44, 2007
   Volume 43, 2006
   Volume 42, 2005
   Volume 41, 2004
   Volume 40, 2003
 
<<<< back

Materiale Plastice (Mater. Plast.), Year 2019, Volume 56, Issue 4, 968-972

https://doi.org/10.37358/MP.19.4.5293

Adrian Apostol, Nicolae Albulescu, Stela Iurciuc, Mircea Iurciuc, Carina Bogdan, Mihaela Viviana Ivan

Difference in Cardiac Electrical Vulnerability Between Passive Silicone Steroid Eluting Lead vs. Active Screw-in Lead


Abstract:
Patients with total atrioventricular block are of particular interest and prone to severe prognosis unless treated with emergency cardiac pacing. We evaluated different types of leads and their impact on the myocardium, according to the fixation type and pacing method.. A pacemaker patient has a different depolarization pattern and a single chamber pacemaker, has by definition, an intracardiac desynchronization and a different electro-mechanical coupling activity. The presence of late potentials is an independent prognosis factor for cardiac death and electrical vulnerability, especially after myocardial infarction(MI). Late potentials recorded as magnitude vector are the expresion of late depolarization of the surrounding tissue and represent the morfological substrate for reentry. Thus, the incidence of late potentials after pacemaker implant, represents the expresion of electrical vulnerability of the stimulated right ventricular myocardium. In order to deeply study the parameters of magnitude vectors, we noticed the appearance of late potentials during the transitory stimulation in acute atrioventricular block and a restoration of vector normal parameters, after conduction recovery and sinus rhythm conversion.


Keywords:
late potentials; pacemaker implant; active or passive lead

Issue: 2019 Volume 56, Issue 4
Pages: 968-972
Publication date: 2019/12/30
https://doi.org/10.37358/MP.19.4.5293
download pdf   Download Pdf Article
Creative Commons License
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Citation Styles
Cite this article as:
APOSTOL, A., ALBULESCU, N., IURCIUC, S., IURCIUC, M., BOGDAN, C., IVAN, M.V., Difference in Cardiac Electrical Vulnerability Between Passive Silicone Steroid Eluting Lead vs. Active Screw-in Lead, Mater. Plast., 56(4), 2019, 968-972. https://doi.org/10.37358/MP.19.4.5293

Vancouver
Apostol A, Albulescu N, Iurciuc S, Iurciuc M, Bogdan C, Ivan MV. Difference in Cardiac Electrical Vulnerability Between Passive Silicone Steroid Eluting Lead vs. Active Screw-in Lead. Mater. Plast.[internet]. 2019 Dec;56(4):968-972. Available from: https://doi.org/10.37358/MP.19.4.5293


APA 6th edition
Apostol, A., Albulescu, N., Iurciuc, S., Iurciuc, M., Bogdan, C. & Ivan, M.V. (2019). Difference in Cardiac Electrical Vulnerability Between Passive Silicone Steroid Eluting Lead vs. Active Screw-in Lead. Materiale Plastice, 56(4), 968-972. https://doi.org/10.37358/MP.19.4.5293


Harvard
Apostol, A., Albulescu, N., Iurciuc, S., Iurciuc, M., Bogdan, C., Ivan, M.V. (2019). 'Difference in Cardiac Electrical Vulnerability Between Passive Silicone Steroid Eluting Lead vs. Active Screw-in Lead', Materiale Plastice, 56(4), pp. 968-972. https://doi.org/10.37358/MP.19.4.5293


IEEE
A. Apostol, N. Albulescu, S. Iurciuc, M. Iurciuc, C. Bogdan, M.V. Ivan, "Difference in Cardiac Electrical Vulnerability Between Passive Silicone Steroid Eluting Lead vs. Active Screw-in Lead". Materiale Plastice, vol. 56, no. 4, pp. 968-972, 2019. [online]. https://doi.org/10.37358/MP.19.4.5293


Text
Adrian Apostol, Nicolae Albulescu, Stela Iurciuc, Mircea Iurciuc, Carina Bogdan, Mihaela Viviana Ivan,
Difference in Cardiac Electrical Vulnerability Between Passive Silicone Steroid Eluting Lead vs. Active Screw-in Lead,
Materiale Plastice,
Volume 56, Issue 4,
2019,
Pages 968-972,
ISSN 2668-8220,
https://doi.org/10.37358/MP.19.4.5293.
(https://revmaterialeplastice.ro/Articles.asp?ID=5293)
Keywords: late potentials; pacemaker implant; active or passive lead


RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Difference in Cardiac Electrical Vulnerability Between Passive Silicone Steroid Eluting Lead vs. Active Screw-in Lead
A1 - Apostol, Adrian
A2 - Albulescu, Nicolae
A3 - Iurciuc, Stela
A4 - Iurciuc, Mircea
A5 - Bogdan, Carina
A6 - Ivan, Mihaela Viviana
JF - Materiale Plastice
JO - Mater. Plast.
PB - Materiale Plastice SRL
SN - 2668-8220
Y1 - 2019
VL - 56
IS - 4
SP - 968
EP - 972
UR - https://doi.org/10.37358/MP.19.4.5293
KW - late potentials
KW - pacemaker implant
KW - active or passive lead
ER -


BibTex
@article{MatPlast2019P968,
author = {Apostol Adrian and Albulescu Nicolae and Iurciuc Stela and Iurciuc Mircea and Bogdan Carina and Ivan Mihaela Viviana},
title = {Difference in Cardiac Electrical Vulnerability Between Passive Silicone Steroid Eluting Lead vs. Active Screw-in Lead},
journal = {Materiale Plastice},
volume = {56},
number = {4},
pages = {968-972},
year = {2019},
issn = {2668-8220},
doi = {https://doi.org/10.37358/MP.19.4.5293},
url = {https://revmaterialeplastice.ro/Articles.asp?ID=5293}
}


Downloads number: 165
<<<< back
 
  Search Authors
Crossref Member Badge
 DOI  logo
 Gold Open Access | Source=http://www.plos.org/  | Author=art designer at PLoS
Creative Commons License