ABOUT INDEXING EDITORIAL BOARD ARCHIVES AUTHOR GUIDELINES SUBMIT PAPER AUTHOR'S SUBSCRIPTIONS AUTHOR'S PAGE
Materiale Plastice
Cite as: Mater. Plast.
https://doi.org/10.37358/Mat.Plast.1964

OSIM Nr. R102356
ISSN Print 0025-5289
ISSN Online 2668-8220
Journal Metrics
* Impact factor 2019: 1.517
* 5-Year IF: 1.179
* CiteScore: 2.4
* H index: 22
Materiale Plastice - Latest Issue

Latest Issue >>>
ARCHIVES
   Volume 57, 2020
   Volume 56, 2019
   Volume 55, 2018
   Volume 54, 2017
   Volume 53, 2016
   Volume 52, 2015
   Volume 51, 2014
   Volume 50, 2013
   Volume 49, 2012
   Volume 48, 2011
   Volume 47, 2010
   Volume 46, 2009
   Volume 45, 2008
   Volume 44, 2007
   Volume 43, 2006
   Volume 42, 2005
   Volume 41, 2004
   Volume 40, 2003
 
<<<< back

Materiale Plastice (Mater. Plast.), Year 2019, Volume 56, Issue 4, 812-816

https://doi.org/10.37358/MP.19.4.5270

Mihaela Pantea, Robert Ciocoiu, Ana Maria Cristina Tancu, Daniela-MĂdĂlina NinĂ, Alexandru Petre, Iulian Vasile Antoniac, Marina Melescanu-Imre

Comparative Study on Two Methods Used in Obtaining 3D Printed Dental Models


Abstract:
The purpose of this study was to assess the accuracy of two 3D printed dental models manufactured after intraoral/IO and extraoral/EO scanning. A dental study model (KaVo Dental GmbH/Germany) was used as a reference for this research; this model was scanned with an industrial scanner (XT H 225 ST/Industrial CT scan/Nikon Metrology Inc./U.S.A.) and a reference STL file was generated (coded M1). Two 3D printed models (Form2/FormLabs Inc./U.S.A.) were produced via IO scanning (TRIOS 3 Battery Cart/3 Shape/Denmark), respectively via EO scanning (Swing Dental Scanner/Dof Inc./South Korea) of the reference dental model. The 3D printed models obtained were scanned with the industrial scanner, resulting in other two STL files (coded M2, respectively M3). All the STL files obtained (reference M1; M2; M3) were compared in pairs, using a 3D analysis software. Good results were achieved in obtaining 3D printed dental models via IO or EO scanning, yet, the 3D printed dental model obtained via IO scanning (M3) showed slightly improved dimensional compatibility with the reference model (M1) in comparison with the 3D printed dental model manufactured via EO scanning (M2).


Keywords:
3D printed models; intraoral scanners; extraoral scanners

Issue: 2019 Volume 56, Issue 4
Pages: 812-816
Publication date: 30/12/2019
https://doi.org/10.37358/MP.19.4.5270
download pdf   Download Pdf Article
Creative Commons License
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Citation Styles
Cite this article as:
PANTEA, M., CIOCOIU, R., TANCU, A.M.C., NINĂ, D., PETRE, A., ANTONIAC, I.V., MELESCANU-IMRE, M., Comparative Study on Two Methods Used in Obtaining 3D Printed Dental Models, Mater. Plast., 56(4), 2019, 812-816.

Vancouver
Pantea M, Ciocoiu R, Tancu AMC, NinĂ D, Petre A, Antoniac IV, Melescanu-Imre M. Comparative Study on Two Methods Used in Obtaining 3D Printed Dental Models. Mater. Plast.[internet]. 2019 Dec;56(4):812-816. Available from: https://doi.org/10.37358/MP.19.4.5270


APA 6th edition
Pantea, M., Ciocoiu, R., Tancu, A.M.C., NinĂ, D., Petre, A., Antoniac, I.V. & Melescanu-Imre, M. (2019). Comparative Study on Two Methods Used in Obtaining 3D Printed Dental Models. Materiale Plastice, 56(4), 812-816. https://doi.org/10.37358/MP.19.4.5270


Harvard
Pantea, M., Ciocoiu, R., Tancu, A.M.C., NinĂ, D., Petre, A., Antoniac, I.V., Melescanu-Imre, M. (2019). 'Comparative Study on Two Methods Used in Obtaining 3D Printed Dental Models', Materiale Plastice, 56(4), pp. 812-816. https://doi.org/10.37358/MP.19.4.5270


IEEE
M. Pantea, R. Ciocoiu, A.M.C. Tancu, D. NinĂ, A. Petre, I.V. Antoniac, M. Melescanu-Imre, "Comparative Study on Two Methods Used in Obtaining 3D Printed Dental Models". Materiale Plastice, vol. 56, no. 4, pp. 812-816, 2019. [online]. https://doi.org/10.37358/MP.19.4.5270


Text
Mihaela Pantea, Robert Ciocoiu, Ana Maria Cristina Tancu, Daniela-MĂdĂlina NinĂ, Alexandru Petre, Iulian Vasile Antoniac, Marina Melescanu-Imre,
Comparative Study on Two Methods Used in Obtaining 3D Printed Dental Models,
Materiale Plastice,
Volume 56, Issue 4,
2019,
Pages 812-816,
ISSN 2668-8220,
https://doi.org/10.37358/MP.19.4.5270.
(https://revmaterialeplastice.ro/Articles.asp?ID=5270)
Keywords: 3D printed models; intraoral scanners; extraoral scanners


RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Comparative Study on Two Methods Used in Obtaining 3D Printed Dental Models
A1 - Pantea, Mihaela
A2 - Ciocoiu, Robert
A3 - Tancu, Ana Maria Cristina
A4 - NinĂ, Daniela-MĂdĂlina
A5 - Petre, Alexandru
A6 - Antoniac, Iulian Vasile
A7 - Melescanu-Imre, Marina
JF - Materiale Plastice
JO - Mater. Plast.
PB - Materiale Plastice SRL
SN - 2668-8220
Y1 - 2019
VL - 56
IS - 4
SP - 812
EP - 816
UR - https://doi.org/10.37358/MP.19.4.5270
KW - 3D printed models
KW - intraoral scanners
KW - extraoral scanners
ER -


BibTex
@article{MatPlast2019P812,
author = {Pantea Mihaela and Ciocoiu Robert and Tancu Ana Maria Cristina and NinĂ Daniela-MĂdĂlina and Petre Alexandru and Antoniac Iulian Vasile and Melescanu-Imre Marina},
title = {Comparative Study on Two Methods Used in Obtaining 3D Printed Dental Models},
journal = {Materiale Plastice},
volume = {56},
number = {4},
pages = {812-816},
year = {2019},
issn = {2668-8220},
doi = {https://doi.org/10.37358/MP.19.4.5270},
url = {https://revmaterialeplastice.ro/Articles.asp?ID=5270}
}
<<<< back
 
  Search Authors
Crossref Member Badge
 DOI  logo
 Gold Open Access | Source=http://www.plos.org/  | Author=art designer at PLoS
Creative Commons License