ABOUT INDEXING EDITORIAL BOARD ARCHIVES AUTHOR GUIDELINES SUBMIT PAPER NEWS, EVENTS AUTHOR'S PAGE CONTACT
Materiale Plastice
Cite as: Mater. Plast.
https://doi.org/10.37358/Mat.Plast.1964

OSIM Nr. R102356
ISSN Print 0025-5289
ISSN Online 2668-8220
Journal Metrics
* Impact factor 2019: 1.517
* 5-Year IF: 1.179
* CiteScore: 2.4
* H index: 22
Materiale Plastice - Latest Issue

Latest Issue >>>
ARCHIVES
   Volume 58, 2021
   Volume 57, 2020
   Volume 56, 2019
   Volume 55, 2018
   Volume 54, 2017
   Volume 53, 2016
   Volume 52, 2015
   Volume 51, 2014
   Volume 50, 2013
   Volume 49, 2012
   Volume 48, 2011
   Volume 47, 2010
   Volume 46, 2009
   Volume 45, 2008
   Volume 44, 2007
   Volume 43, 2006
   Volume 42, 2005
   Volume 41, 2004
   Volume 40, 2003
 
<<<< back

Materiale Plastice (Mater. Plast.), Year 2019, Volume 56, Issue 3, 592-595

https://doi.org/10.37358/MP.19.3.5235

Andra Gamen, Gianina Iovan, Simona Stoleriu, Galina Pancu, Irina Nica, Andrei Georgescu, Ionut Taraboanta, Sorin Andrian

Evaluation of Mechanical Parameters at Compression Test for Different Restorative Composite Resins


Abstract:
The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the mechanical parameters at compression tests for two different restorative composite resins. The materials here under study were: Gradia Direct (GC Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) and Filtek Ultimate Universal Restorative, (3M ESPE, St. Paul, MN, USA). 30 cylindrical samples, 15 for each material, with a thickness of 6 mm and a diameter of 5 mm, were made. The compression behavior at mechanical tests for each sample was analyzed. One-Sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test followed by Paired Samples t-Test was used for statistical analysis and determining the level of significance. Gradia Direct had a lower value of Young’s modulus than Filtek Ultimate Universal Restorative, the results being statistically significant (p = 0.001 < 0.05). The comparative evaluation of the compressive strength did not reveal statistically significant results between the two materials (p = 0.098 > 0,05). Regarding the compressive strain the values were significantly lower for Filtek Ultimate Universal Restorative (p=0.000 < 0.05). The microhybrid composite evaluated in the present study proved to have better mechanical properties than the nanofilled composite.


Keywords:
mechanical parameters; compression test; restorative composite

Issue: 2019 Volume 56, Issue 3
Pages: 592-595
Publication date: 2019/9/30
https://doi.org/10.37358/MP.19.3.5235
download pdf   Download Pdf Article
Creative Commons License
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Citation Styles
Cite this article as:
GAMEN, A., IOVAN, G., STOLERIU, S., PANCU, G., NICA, I., GEORGESCU, A., TARABOANTA, I., ANDRIAN, S., Evaluation of Mechanical Parameters at Compression Test for Different Restorative Composite Resins, Mater. Plast., 56(3), 2019, 592-595.

Vancouver
Gamen A, Iovan G, Stoleriu S, Pancu G, Nica I, Georgescu A, Taraboanta I, Andrian S. Evaluation of Mechanical Parameters at Compression Test for Different Restorative Composite Resins. Mater. Plast.[internet]. 2019 Jul;56(3):592-595. Available from: https://doi.org/10.37358/MP.19.3.5235


APA 6th edition
Gamen, A., Iovan, G., Stoleriu, S., Pancu, G., Nica, I., Georgescu, A., Taraboanta, I. & Andrian, S. (2019). Evaluation of Mechanical Parameters at Compression Test for Different Restorative Composite Resins. Materiale Plastice, 56(3), 592-595. https://doi.org/10.37358/MP.19.3.5235


Harvard
Gamen, A., Iovan, G., Stoleriu, S., Pancu, G., Nica, I., Georgescu, A., Taraboanta, I., Andrian, S. (2019). 'Evaluation of Mechanical Parameters at Compression Test for Different Restorative Composite Resins', Materiale Plastice, 56(3), pp. 592-595. https://doi.org/10.37358/MP.19.3.5235


IEEE
A. Gamen, G. Iovan, S. Stoleriu, G. Pancu, I. Nica, A. Georgescu, I. Taraboanta, S. Andrian, "Evaluation of Mechanical Parameters at Compression Test for Different Restorative Composite Resins". Materiale Plastice, vol. 56, no. 3, pp. 592-595, 2019. [online]. https://doi.org/10.37358/MP.19.3.5235


Text
Andra Gamen, Gianina Iovan, Simona Stoleriu, Galina Pancu, Irina Nica, Andrei Georgescu, Ionut Taraboanta, Sorin Andrian,
Evaluation of Mechanical Parameters at Compression Test for Different Restorative Composite Resins,
Materiale Plastice,
Volume 56, Issue 3,
2019,
Pages 592-595,
ISSN 2668-8220,
https://doi.org/10.37358/MP.19.3.5235.
(https://revmaterialeplastice.ro/Articlegs.asp?ID=5235)
Keywords: mechanical parameters; compression test; restorative composite


RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Evaluation of Mechanical Parameters at Compression Test for Different Restorative Composite Resins
A1 - Gamen, Andra
A2 - Iovan, Gianina
A3 - Stoleriu, Simona
A4 - Pancu, Galina
A5 - Nica, Irina
A6 - Georgescu, Andrei
A7 - Taraboanta, Ionut
A8 - Andrian, Sorin
JF - Materiale Plastice
JO - Mater. Plast.
PB - Materiale Plastice SRL
SN - 2668-8220
Y1 - 2019
VL - 56
IS - 3
SP - 592
EP - 595
UR - https://doi.org/10.37358/MP.19.3.5235
KW - mechanical parameters
KW - compression test
KW - restorative composite
ER -


BibTex
@article{MatPlast2019P592,
author = {Gamen Andra and Iovan Gianina and Stoleriu Simona and Pancu Galina and Nica Irina and Georgescu Andrei and Taraboanta Ionut and Andrian Sorin},
title = {Evaluation of Mechanical Parameters at Compression Test for Different Restorative Composite Resins},
journal = {Materiale Plastice},
volume = {56},
number = {3},
pages = {592-595},
year = {2019},
issn = {2668-8220},
doi = {https://doi.org/10.37358/MP.19.3.5235},
url = {https://revmaterialeplastice.ro/Articlegs.asp?ID=5235}
}
<<<< back
 
  Search Authors
Crossref Member Badge
 DOI  logo
 Gold Open Access | Source=http://www.plos.org/  | Author=art designer at PLoS
Creative Commons License