Comparison of Fracture Resistance of Teeth Presenting non-carious Cervical Lesions, Restored with Different Composite Materials

Margarit, Ruxandra; Tanasescu, Livia Alice; Bodnar, Dana; Ion, Camelia Gabriela; Burlibasa, Mihai; Bisoc, Adriana; Farcasiu, Catalina; Dina, Magdalena Natalia; Andrei, Oana Cella

Ruxandra Margarit, Livia Alice Tanasescu, Dana Bodnar, Camelia Gabriela Ion, Mihai Burlibasa, Adriana Bisoc, Catalina Farcasiu, Magdalena Natalia Dina, Oana Cella Andrei

Comparison of Fracture Resistance of Teeth Presenting non-carious Cervical Lesions, Restored with Different Composite Materials

Abstract:
The aim of our study was to compare the fracture resistance of teeth presenting non-carious cervical lesions restored with different types of esthetic composite materials. 20 extracted unspoiled maxillary first molars were mechanically cleaned and immersed in saline solution containing 0.1% thymol at 4°C for a period of 48 hours. Cervical cavities with a cervical-occlusal diameter of 2 mm and a mesial-distal diameter of 3mm were filled with ormocer, flow nano-composite, nano-composite and compomer. Fracture resistance was tested with a universal loading machine (Lloyd Instruments), with a maximum force of 5 kN and a crosshead speed of 1.0 mm/min; the authors used NEXYGEN Data Analysis Software and ANOVA method. For the group A (commercial grade ormocer), the smallest load that determined the sample failure was 650 N and the highest load was 1050 N, the mean value being 858 N ± 150.89 N. For the group B (commercial grade flow nano-composite), the smallest load is 530 N, the highest load is 800 N, mean value being 654 N ± 112.6 N. For the group C (commercial grade nano-composite), the smallest load is 680 N, the highest load is 1200 N, mean value being 926 N ± 209.35 N. For the group D (commercial grade compomer), the smallest load is 1100 N, highest load is 1250N, mean value being 1180 N ± 62.04 N. A p value of 0.000311 (p<0.05) shows that there are significant differences between the four groups. Conclusions. The best fracture resistance of teeth presenting non-carious cervical lesions, restored with different types of esthetic composite materials is assured by the compomer, followed by the nano-composite, which proved to be superior to ormocer. The flow nano-composite gives the lowest fracture resistance.

Keywords:
noncarious cervical lesions; composites; fracture resistance

Issue: 2020 Volume 57, Issue 1

Pages: 299-305

Publication date: 2020/4/17

https://doi.org/10.37358/MP.20.1.5339

Download Pdf Article

This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

Citation Styles

Cite this article as:
MARGARIT, R., TANASESCU, L.A., BODNAR, D., ION, C.G., BURLIBASA, M., BISOC, A., FARCASIU, C., DINA, M.N., ANDREI, O.C., Comparison of Fracture Resistance of Teeth Presenting non-carious Cervical Lesions, Restored with Different Composite Materials, Mater. Plast., 57(1), 2020, 299-305. https://doi.org/10.37358/MP.20.1.5339

Vancouver
Margarit R, Tanasescu LA, Bodnar D, Ion CG, Burlibasa M, Bisoc A, Farcasiu C, Dina MN, Andrei OC. Comparison of Fracture Resistance of Teeth Presenting non-carious Cervical Lesions, Restored with Different Composite Materials. Mater. Plast.[internet]. 2020 Jan;57(1):299-305. Available from: https://doi.org/10.37358/MP.20.1.5339

APA 6th edition
Margarit, R., Tanasescu, L.A., Bodnar, D., Ion, C.G., Burlibasa, M., Bisoc, A.,... Andrei, O.C. (2020). Comparison of Fracture Resistance of Teeth Presenting non-carious Cervical Lesions, Restored with Different Composite Materials. Materiale Plastice, 57(1), 299-305. https://doi.org/10.37358/MP.20.1.5339

Harvard
Margarit, R., Tanasescu, L.A., Bodnar, D., Ion, C.G., Burlibasa, M., Bisoc, A., Farcasiu, C., Dina, M.N., Andrei, O.C. (2020). 'Comparison of Fracture Resistance of Teeth Presenting non-carious Cervical Lesions, Restored with Different Composite Materials', Materiale Plastice, 57(1), pp. 299-305. https://doi.org/10.37358/MP.20.1.5339

IEEE
R. Margarit, L.A. Tanasescu, D. Bodnar, C.G. Ion, M. Burlibasa, A. Bisoc, C. Farcasiu, M.N. Dina, O.C. Andrei, "Comparison of Fracture Resistance of Teeth Presenting non-carious Cervical Lesions, Restored with Different Composite Materials". Materiale Plastice, vol. 57, no. 1, pp. 299-305, 2020. [online]. https://doi.org/10.37358/MP.20.1.5339

Text
Ruxandra Margarit, Livia Alice Tanasescu, Dana Bodnar, Camelia Gabriela Ion, Mihai Burlibasa, Adriana Bisoc, Catalina Farcasiu, Magdalena Natalia Dina, Oana Cella Andrei,
Comparison of Fracture Resistance of Teeth Presenting non-carious Cervical Lesions, Restored with Different Composite Materials,
Materiale Plastice,
Volume 57, Issue 1,
2020,
Pages 299-305,
ISSN 2668-8220,
https://doi.org/10.37358/MP.20.1.5339.
(https://revmaterialeplastice.ro/Articles.asp?ID=5339)
Keywords: noncarious cervical lesions; composites; fracture resistance

RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Comparison of Fracture Resistance of Teeth Presenting non-carious Cervical Lesions, Restored with Different Composite Materials
A1 - Margarit, Ruxandra
A2 - Tanasescu, Livia Alice
A3 - Bodnar, Dana
A4 - Ion, Camelia Gabriela
A5 - Burlibasa, Mihai
A6 - Bisoc, Adriana
A7 - Farcasiu, Catalina
A8 - Dina, Magdalena Natalia
A9 - Andrei, Oana Cella
JF - Materiale Plastice
JO - Mater. Plast.
PB - Materiale Plastice SRL
SN - 2668-8220
Y1 - 2020
VL - 57
IS - 1
SP - 299
EP - 305
UR - https://doi.org/10.37358/MP.20.1.5339
KW - noncarious cervical lesions
KW - composites
KW - fracture resistance
ER -

BibTex
@article{MatPlast2020P299,
author = {Margarit Ruxandra and Tanasescu Livia Alice and Bodnar Dana and Ion Camelia Gabriela and Burlibasa Mihai and Bisoc Adriana and Farcasiu Catalina and Dina Magdalena Natalia and Andrei Oana Cella},
title = {Comparison of Fracture Resistance of Teeth Presenting non-carious Cervical Lesions, Restored with Different Composite Materials},
journal = {Materiale Plastice},
volume = {57},
number = {1},
pages = {299-305},
year = {2020},
issn = {2668-8220},
doi = {https://doi.org/10.37358/MP.20.1.5339},
url = {https://revmaterialeplastice.ro/Articles.asp?ID=5339}
}

Downloads number: 136

<<<< back

PUBLISHING SECTION

Author Guidelines

* Paper Drafting

* Paper Template (doc)

* Ethical Statement (doc)

* Paper Submission

* Author Payments

Ghidul Autorului (ro)

Submit Paper

Author's Page