ABOUT INDEXING EDITORIAL BOARD ARCHIVES AUTHOR GUIDELINES SUBMIT PAPER NEWS, EVENTS AUTHOR'S PAGE CONTACT
Materiale Plastice
Cite as: Mater. Plast.
https://doi.org/10.37358/Mat.Plast.1964

OSIM Nr. R102356
ISSN Print 0025-5289
ISSN Online 2668-8220
Journal Metrics
* Impact factor 2019: 1.517
* 5-Year IF: 1.179
* CiteScore: 2.4
* H index: 22
Materiale Plastice - Latest Issue

Latest Issue >>>
ARCHIVES
   Volume 58, 2021
   Volume 57, 2020
   Volume 56, 2019
   Volume 55, 2018
   Volume 54, 2017
   Volume 53, 2016
   Volume 52, 2015
   Volume 51, 2014
   Volume 50, 2013
   Volume 49, 2012
   Volume 48, 2011
   Volume 47, 2010
   Volume 46, 2009
   Volume 45, 2008
   Volume 44, 2007
   Volume 43, 2006
   Volume 42, 2005
   Volume 41, 2004
   Volume 40, 2003
 
<<<< back

Materiale Plastice (Mater. Plast.), Year 2018, Volume 55, Issue 3, 447-453

https://doi.org/10.37358/MP.18.3.5049

Irina Nica, Gianina Iovan, Simona Stoleriu, Cristina Angela Ghiorghe, Galina Pancu, Radu Comaneci, Sorin Andrian

Comparative Study Regarding the Compressive Strength of Different Composite Resins Used for Direct Restorations


Abstract:
The aim of this study was to evaluate and to compare the compression behavior under identical mechanical tests, of three different composite resins, by determining Young’s modulus for compression, ultimate compressive strength and ultimate compressive strain. The studied materials were: Filtek Z250 Universal Restorative, Filtek Z550 and Filtek Bulk Fill Posterior Restorative (3M ESPE, St. Paul, MN, USA). Fifteen cylindrical samples, having 6 mm in height and 5 mm in diameter, were made from each material, using plastic molds. The samples were subjected to quantitative analysis of the compression behavior after mechanical tests. The fractured fragments of the samples were subjected to qualitative surface evaluation by scanning electron microscopy. Results were statistically analyzed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Tukey’s post hoc test. Filtek Z250 had the lowest value of Young’s modulus for compression and the results were statistically significant (p<0.05) when compared to Filtek Bulk Fill Posterior Restorative and Filtek Z550. There were no statistically significant differences between all three materials regarding ultimate compressive strength (p>0.05). The lowest value for ultimate compressive strain was recorded for Filtek Bulk Fill.


Keywords:
composite resins; Young’s modulus; compressive strength; compressive strain; SEM

Issue: 2018 Volume 55, Issue 3
Pages: 447-453
Publication date: 2018/9/30
https://doi.org/10.37358/MP.18.3.5049
download pdf   Download Pdf Article
Creative Commons License
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Citation Styles
Cite this article as:
NICA, I., IOVAN, G., STOLERIU, S., GHIORGHE, C.A., PANCU, G., COMANECI, R., ANDRIAN, S., Comparative Study Regarding the Compressive Strength of Different Composite Resins Used for Direct Restorations, Mater. Plast., 55(3), 2018, 447-453.

Vancouver
Nica I, Iovan G, Stoleriu S, Ghiorghe CA, Pancu G, Comaneci R, Andrian S. Comparative Study Regarding the Compressive Strength of Different Composite Resins Used for Direct Restorations. Mater. Plast.[internet]. 2018 Jul;55(3):447-453. Available from: https://doi.org/10.37358/MP.18.3.5049


APA 6th edition
Nica, I., Iovan, G., Stoleriu, S., Ghiorghe, C.A., Pancu, G., Comaneci, R. & Andrian, S. (2018). Comparative Study Regarding the Compressive Strength of Different Composite Resins Used for Direct Restorations. Materiale Plastice, 55(3), 447-453. https://doi.org/10.37358/MP.18.3.5049


Harvard
Nica, I., Iovan, G., Stoleriu, S., Ghiorghe, C.A., Pancu, G., Comaneci, R., Andrian, S. (2018). 'Comparative Study Regarding the Compressive Strength of Different Composite Resins Used for Direct Restorations', Materiale Plastice, 55(3), pp. 447-453. https://doi.org/10.37358/MP.18.3.5049


IEEE
I. Nica, G. Iovan, S. Stoleriu, C.A. Ghiorghe, G. Pancu, R. Comaneci, S. Andrian, "Comparative Study Regarding the Compressive Strength of Different Composite Resins Used for Direct Restorations". Materiale Plastice, vol. 55, no. 3, pp. 447-453, 2018. [online]. https://doi.org/10.37358/MP.18.3.5049


Text
Irina Nica, Gianina Iovan, Simona Stoleriu, Cristina Angela Ghiorghe, Galina Pancu, Radu Comaneci, Sorin Andrian,
Comparative Study Regarding the Compressive Strength of Different Composite Resins Used for Direct Restorations,
Materiale Plastice,
Volume 55, Issue 3,
2018,
Pages 447-453,
ISSN 2668-8220,
https://doi.org/10.37358/MP.18.3.5049.
(https://revmaterialeplastice.ro/Articlegs.asp?ID=5049)
Keywords: composite resins; Young’s modulus; compressive strength; compressive strain; SEM


RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Comparative Study Regarding the Compressive Strength of Different Composite Resins Used for Direct Restorations
A1 - Nica, Irina
A2 - Iovan, Gianina
A3 - Stoleriu, Simona
A4 - Ghiorghe, Cristina Angela
A5 - Pancu, Galina
A6 - Comaneci, Radu
A7 - Andrian, Sorin
JF - Materiale Plastice
JO - Mater. Plast.
PB - Materiale Plastice SRL
SN - 2668-8220
Y1 - 2018
VL - 55
IS - 3
SP - 447
EP - 453
UR - https://doi.org/10.37358/MP.18.3.5049
KW - composite resins
KW - Young’s modulus
KW - compressive strength
KW - compressive strain
KW - SEM
ER -


BibTex
@article{MatPlast2018P447,
author = {Nica Irina and Iovan Gianina and Stoleriu Simona and Ghiorghe Cristina Angela and Pancu Galina and Comaneci Radu and Andrian Sorin},
title = {Comparative Study Regarding the Compressive Strength of Different Composite Resins Used for Direct Restorations},
journal = {Materiale Plastice},
volume = {55},
number = {3},
pages = {447-453},
year = {2018},
issn = {2668-8220},
doi = {https://doi.org/10.37358/MP.18.3.5049},
url = {https://revmaterialeplastice.ro/Articlegs.asp?ID=5049}
}
<<<< back
 
  Search Authors
Crossref Member Badge
 DOI  logo
 Gold Open Access | Source=http://www.plos.org/  | Author=art designer at PLoS
Creative Commons License