ABOUT INDEXING EDITORIAL BOARD ARCHIVES AUTHOR GUIDELINES SUBMIT PAPER NEWS, EVENTS AUTHOR'S PAGE CONTACT
Materiale Plastice
Cite as: Mater. Plast.
https://doi.org/10.37358/Mat.Plast.1964

OSIM Nr. R102356
ISSN Print 0025-5289
ISSN Online 2668-8220
Journal Metrics
* Impact factor 2019: 1.517
* 5-Year IF: 1.179
* CiteScore: 2.4
* H index: 22
Materiale Plastice - Latest Issue

Latest Issue >>>
ARCHIVES
   Volume 58, 2021
   Volume 57, 2020
   Volume 56, 2019
   Volume 55, 2018
   Volume 54, 2017
   Volume 53, 2016
   Volume 52, 2015
   Volume 51, 2014
   Volume 50, 2013
   Volume 49, 2012
   Volume 48, 2011
   Volume 47, 2010
   Volume 46, 2009
   Volume 45, 2008
   Volume 44, 2007
   Volume 43, 2006
   Volume 42, 2005
   Volume 41, 2004
   Volume 40, 2003
 
<<<< back

Materiale Plastice (Mater. Plast.), Year 2016, Volume 53, Issue 4, 689-692



Anamaria Florescu, Anna Maria Pangica, Violeta Hancu, Roxana Manu, Cornelia Florentina Biclesanu

FEM Study Regarding Materials Retention Used for Abfraction Adhesive Restoration


Abstract:
This study compares, by means of the finite element method (FEM), the behaviour of the restorations done with the same material, the same adhesive system and under the action of the same force values applied to four 3-D lower premolar finite element models, representing four different cavity shapes. An extracted lower premolar which presented an abfraction lesion has been used. The restoration was achieved by using etch-and-rinse adhesive systems and Giomers. The premolar was scanned and the resulting sections were processed and converted into a 3D digital format. Thus, a model of finite elements which presented a restored wedge-shaped cavity in the cervical dental area was obtained. Then, by modifying the shape and dimensions, there were created another 3 modified-shape cavities. Forces of different magnitudes (90-150N), exerted at a 45 degree angle on buccal cusp, have been applied. If adhesive system tensile strength is about 25MPa, this limit is reached at 120N only for the third model. For Beautifil FO2 the tensile strength is not reached when maximum forces are applied (150N) and for Beautifil II, the tensile strength is reached only for model 4, when a force of 150N is applied. In order to increase the retention of the abfraction restoration, changing the shape of the cavity should be associated with the use of Giomers and adhesive system with tensile strength exceeding 25MPa.


Keywords:
cavity shape; noncarious cervical lesions (NCCL); abfraction; finite element method (FEM); Giomer; adhesive system

Issue: 2016 Volume 53, Issue 4
Pages: 689-692
Publication date: 2016/12/30
download pdf   Download Pdf Article
Creative Commons License
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
<<<< back
 
  Search Authors
Crossref Member Badge
 DOI  logo
 Gold Open Access | Source=http://www.plos.org/  | Author=art designer at PLoS
Creative Commons License