ABOUT INDEXING EDITORIAL BOARD ARCHIVES AUTHOR GUIDELINES SUBMIT PAPER NEWS, EVENTS AUTHOR'S PAGE CONTACT
Materiale Plastice
Cite as: Mater. Plast.
https://doi.org/10.37358/Mat.Plast.1964

OSIM Nr. R102356
ISSN Print 0025-5289
ISSN Online 2668-8220
Journal Metrics
* Impact factor 2019: 1.517
* 5-Year IF: 1.179
* CiteScore: 2.4
* H index: 22
Materiale Plastice - Latest Issue

Latest Issue >>>
ARCHIVES
   Volume 57, 2020
   Volume 56, 2019
   Volume 55, 2018
   Volume 54, 2017
   Volume 53, 2016
   Volume 52, 2015
   Volume 51, 2014
   Volume 50, 2013
   Volume 49, 2012
   Volume 48, 2011
   Volume 47, 2010
   Volume 46, 2009
   Volume 45, 2008
   Volume 44, 2007
   Volume 43, 2006
   Volume 42, 2005
   Volume 41, 2004
   Volume 40, 2003
 
<<<< back

Materiale Plastice (Mater. Plast.), Year 2016, Volume 53, Issue 1, 119-125



Bogdan Andor, Jenel M. Patrascu, Sorin Florescu, Dan Cojocaru, Mihai Sandesc, Florin Borcan, Ovidiu Boruga, Sorin Bolintineanu

Comparison of Different Knee Implants Used on Patients with Osteoarthritis Control Study


Abstract:
The field of cartilage repair and restoration has expanded a lot in the last decade since articular cartilage problems are very common. As a consequence, many biomaterials were created in order to aid physicians in treating different osteochondral defects. Polymers like polyurethanes or PGA-hyaluronan have been frequently used as the in vivo cartilage tissue repair solution, as reported in animal studies and in clinical applications. Three different implants (Agili-C, Hyalograft C, and Chondrotissue) were used in 23 patients (6 medial and 17 lateral lesions) in this study. Patients were assessed at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months postoperative follow-up visits using the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) scores and Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS). The follow-up assessments demonstrated clinically and statistically significant improvements (p < 0.05) in all clinical outcome scores, as compared to the respective preoperative values: IKDC (48.9/77.1 for Chondrotissue implants), KOOS symptoms (58.2/71.9 for Agili-C implants), KOOS pain (54.8/66.1 for Agili-C implants), KOOS daily living activities (64.2/76.3 for Agili-C implants), KOOS sports (38.3/60.8 for Agili-C implants), KOOS quality of life (40.1/60.7 for Agili-C implants) demonstrating improvements in the case of implants previously mentioned. The overall results of this study support the successful use of the Agili-C, Chondrotissue and Hyalograft-C implants for the treatment of knee cartilage lesions.


Keywords:
cartilage repair; implants; IKDC; KOOS; Agili-C; Chondrotissue; Hyalograft-C

Issue: 2016 Volume 53, Issue 1
Pages: 119-125
Publication date: 2016/3/30
download pdf   Download Pdf Article
Creative Commons License
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
<<<< back
 
  Search Authors
Crossref Member Badge
 DOI  logo
 Gold Open Access | Source=http://www.plos.org/  | Author=art designer at PLoS
Creative Commons License